The absolute requirement of RTTT is that states must adopt national standards. Forty-eight of the fifty states, with Alaska and Texas being the only exceptions, have signed on to the Common Core Standards Initiative. This initiative is funded and promoted by the National Governors' Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). They are developing common core standards in math and English that are 'internationally benchmarked.'
Although touted as "state-led" and "voluntary," all of these severely cash-strapped states (41 as of the January 19th deadline) that hope to receive RTTT funds MUST adopt these standards (national curriculum). Part of the competitive application process requires states to show the largest number of school districts agreeing to take on these national/international standards. That is not voluntary. Rather, depending on one's point of view, it is either bribery or economic and ideological blackmail.
It is also important to note that these same two ostensibly state government-associated groups (NGA and CCSSO) developing RTTT also produced America 2000 under the Bush 41 administration that morphed into Goals 2000 in 1994 under President Clinton. Goals 2000 and that year's reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act combined for the first time to require that states and school districts comply with federal standards listed in Goals 2000 in order to receive federal education dollars.
Quotable
--Pres. Bill Clinton, State of the Union, Jan. 25, 1994: Our Goals 2000 proposal will
empower individual school districts to experiment with ideas like chartering their schools to be
run by private corporations or having more public school choice, to do
whatever they wish to do as long as we measure every school by one high
standard: Are our children learning what they need to know to compete and
win in the global economy?
Goals 2000 links world-class standards to grassroots
reforms and I hope Congress will pass it without delay. Our school to work
initiative will for the first time link school to the world of work . . . --Pres. Bill Clinton, State of the Union, Jan. 23, 1996: Every diploma ought to mean something. I challenge every
community, every school and every state to adopt national standards
of excellence; to measure whether schools are meeting those standards; to
cut bureaucratic red tape so that schools and teachers have more
flexibility for grass-roots reform; and to hold them accountable for results. That's
what our Goals 2000 initiative is all about. --Pres. Bill Clinton, State of the Union, Feb. 4, 1997: Tonight I issue a challenge to the nation. Every state should adopt
high national standards, and by 1999, every state should test every 4th
grader in reading and every 8th grader in math to make sure these
standards are met.
Raising standards will not be easy, and some of our children
will not be able to meet them at first. The point is not to put our
children down, but to lift them up. Good tests will show us who needs
help, what changes in teaching to make, and which schools need to
improve. They can help us end social promotion, for no child should
move from grade school to junior high or junior high to high school
until he or she is ready.
With our support, nearly every state has set
higher academic standards for public schools and a voluntary national
test is being developed to measure the progress of our students. With
over $1 billion in discounts available this year, we are well on our
way to our goal of connecting every classroom and library to the
Internet.
--Pres. Bill Clinton, State of the Union, Jan. 27, 2000: [A]ll successful schools have followed the same proven formula: higher
standards, more accountability, and extra help so children who need it
can get it to reach those standards. I have sent Congress a reform plan
based on that formula. It holds states and school districts accountable
for progress, and rewards them for results. Each year, our national
government invests more than $15 billion in our schools. It is time to
support what works and stop supporting what doesn't. (Applause.)
-------------------------------------
The Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) and the National
Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) have
initiated a state-led process of developing and adopting a common core
of state standards.
As
part of this process, they have convened a National Policy Forum
composed of signatory national organizations (e.g., the Alliance for
Excellent Education, Business Roundtable, National School Boards
Association, Council of Great City Schools, Hunt Institute, National
Association of State Boards of Education, National Education
Association, and others) to share ideas, gather input, and inform the
common core state standards initiative.
What will make this process different from other efforts to create common standards?
Both the timing of this initiative as well as the process give it a
high probability for success. There is a growing belief among state
leaders, education leaders, and business leaders that differences in
state standards, in an era of increasing student mobility and global
competition, no longer make sense.
This
process is different since it is a state-led, vs a federal effort, and
has the support of several major national organizations, including
CCSSO, the NGA Center, the Alliance for Excellent Education, the
National Education Association, the Hunt Institute, and the Business
Roundtable, and involves participation of leading standards developers
from Achieve, ACT, and the College Board. [Emphasis added]
States have
been the leaders of standards-based reform efforts. The proposed
adoption process respects and takes into consideration unique state
contexts and encourages states to adopt the common core state standards.
Are these national standards?
No. [sic] This initiative is driven by collective state action and states
will voluntarily adopt the standards based on the timelines and context
in their state.
[And based on the buckets of money Secretary of Education Duncan is passing out to states that toe the line.]